Don’t get me wrong, children have ALWAYS been my number one concern…but when a Supreme Court Rules that Double Jeopardy is null and void, I have a problem!

“This is not an honest mistake. It was not an editorial oversight by the broadcast networks. It did not occur too late for the evening deadline. This was a deliberate and insidious withholding of national news to protect the ‘Chosen One’ who ABC, CBS and NBC have worked so hard to elect and for whom they are now abusing their journalistic influence. Even when CBS mentioned the suit ever-so-briefly, like so many others, they deliberately distorted the issue by framing it as a contraception lawsuit when it is much broader, a religious freedom issue – and they know it… Let’s be blunt: They spiked the news…”

This weekend, a video produced by Free Market America went live on YouTube — and it is racking up nationwide hits. Deservedly so. The Earth Day-timed message is compelling and extremely relevant this campaign season. As the group writes: “The environmental agenda has been infected by extremism — it’s become an economic suicide pact. And we’re here to challenge it.” Watch:

With Ron Paul having lost the nomination (presumed), his dedicated supporters are swarming lightly guarded Republican redoubts in an attempt to infiltrate the top echelons of the party.

The Supreme Court of the United States is set to consider shutting down a legal challenge that would let the U.S. eavesdrop on overseas communication. But according to Judge Napolitano, it may just be more hypocrisy from the Obama administration to try to keep the same type of monitoring of our freedoms that Bush was criticized for having.

During the Bush administration, Congress amended two laws, Napolitano said – the Patriot Act and the Fraud Intelligence Security Act… which allow a Federal court to listen to conversations of foreign nationals without any allegations against them, whether inside or outside the United States. The problem, according to the judge, is that some of these conversations are with Americans, who are technically protected by the Fourth Amendment, which says there has to be probable cause for the crimes.

Also, Judge Napolitano said that President Obama is, as president, not only defending this action but is saying it can’t be challenged in courts … and he’s using it more often than President Bush ever did. This is a direct difference from his time as senator, in which he spoke out against such actions.

Interesting….

The justices will address one of the biggest controversies surrounding the response to the Sept. 11 attacks – the government’s use of electronic surveillance.